I smell of dust, old books and bluebells. Shurly you jest, my liege? : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18 |
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
Too cool for subject
That said, I wanna add: "Alpha & Omega" is a great piece. Absolutely nothing wrong with it and I love it. Like Bev I look forward to reading it again at some point, when I find a quiet evening at home and can do it in one go :-)”
Well first off, thanks for the gorgeous comment which, as you know, I feel no shame in lapping-up like a cat with a bowl of cream. (o:
As for your thoughts on the language; you’ve hit my nail squarely on its head. It depends to a certain extent what it is you’re trying to achieve, I guess. Shakespeare wasn’t writing contemporary speech, he was writing a stylized form of 16C English for effect. If what you’re trying for is a poetical, ‘this is not of our time’ effect, then fine. If what you’re after is two characters, in and of their time talking to each other as two Romans, two Egyptions – whatever, then I really think contemporary English is most appropriate.