I smell of dust, old books and bluebells. Well. : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18 |
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
heh!
I hope you like Matt, I think he's wonderful and most people this side of the ocean seem to agree. He seems like a refreshing return to Old Who Values and I'm very glad indeed. IMO, the writing's not been as great as anticipated but I'm sure it will improve - if the Doctor's right, a bit of ropy writing cannot harm you. :o) I mean, I came through 47 years of green bubble wrap, hair-dryer spaceships and rubber monsters, I can live with a little writery daftness.
I can't tell from your post if you'd seen Tom's Doctor before or was it new for you? - and if so, what did you think? Most Americans seem only to know about Four, as far as classic Who goes.